- Acting as Quebec counsel to major global manufacturers in connection with their product liability litigations;
- Representing a leading pharmaceutical company in a class proceeding in Quebec involving product liability and consumer protection allegations;
- Acted for an online streaming service in a class action matter concerning allegations of violating the Quebec consumer protection act;
- Acted on behalf of manufacturers in a product liability claim resulting in personal injury claims;
- Representing a gas retailer in the Quebec class action concerning the allegations of price fixing of gasoline in the retail level;
- Quebec co-counsel for a defendant in the DRAM alleged price fixing class action;
- Co-counsel acting on behalf of the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (CAIRP) before the Supreme Court of Canada in Quebec (Revenue) v. Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny, 2009 SCC 49,  3 SCR 286
- Counsel for the receiver in a cross-border restructuring of major plastic manufacturer.
- Counsel for secured lenders in a cross boarder restructuring
Sidney Elbaz is a litigation lawyer with extensive experience in class actions, competition and antitrust, product liability, and consumer protection. Representing clients in the automotive, banking and finance, and life sciences sectors, he appears before all levels of court in Québec, the federal courts and a variety of tribunals.
Defending class action proceedings under Québec’s Consumer Protection Act, Sidney has deep insight into matters concerning allegations of false representations, as well as product liability and failure to warn claims.
Sidney has also acted as Québec counsel in numerous cartel and conspiracy cases, defending major class actions involving allegations of anti-competitive activities relating to air cargo, air passengers, chocolate, gasoline, dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) and optical lenses.
Recognized as a leading lawyer in class action litigation by Best Lawyers in Canada, Sidney is also listed as a litigation star in the 2021 edition of Benchmark Litigation Canada.
Démystifier le processus de l'action collective, Québec bar webinar, SpeakerJanuary 20, 2021
Les grands rendez-vous de la formation 2020, Québec bar training session, SpeakerMay 26, 2020
L’Association du Barreau Canadien Section Litiges commerciaux : revue des décisions marquantes de la dernière année en litige commercial2019
Colloque National des Recours Collections, Développements récents au Québec, au Canada et aux États-Unis. Influence du nouveau code de procédure civile au stade de l'autorisation2019
L’Association du Barreau Canadien, Section Litiges commerciaux : Revue jurisprudentielle en litige commercial2018
OpenForum Financement et Sureté : Revue annuelle des décisions marquantes en matière de sûreté au Québec et en Ontario : leurs impacts sur votre pratique2017
Presentation to the Canadian Institute of Contemporary Jewish Law and Ethics – Chabad of Town of Mont Royal-Goals of Class Actions in Canada: Access to Justice, Judicial Economy, and Behavior Modification With Examples2017
L’Association du Barreau Canadien, Section Litiges commerciaux : un bilan jurisprudentiel de la dernière année en matière commerciale2016
Rendez-vous 2015 en droit des sociétés : Recours en oppression au Québec : développements récents depuis l'arrêt de la Cour suprême dans BCE2015
10th Annual Pan-Canadian Insolvency & Restructuring Law Conference. Challenges Encompassing Consumer Insolvency Issues23 - 24 October 2014
- Lecturer University of Ottawa National Program – Security for Debt (in 2008 and 2009)
Rankings & Recognition
- Recognized by Best Lawyers in Canada (2022) as a leading lawyer in the areas of Class Action Litigation; Corporate and Commercial Litigation and Product Liability Law
- Recognized in the 2021 Benchmark Litigation: Canada Guide as a Litigation Star
- Recognized by the Best Lawyers in Canada (2021) as a leading lawyer in the areas of Class Action Litigation and Corporate & Commercial Litigation
- Recognized by Best Lawyers in Canada (2020) as a leading lawyer in the area of Class Action Litigation
- Recognized in the 2020 Benchmark Litigation: Canada Guide as a Litigation Star
- Recognized in the 2019 Benchmark Litigation Canada Guide as a Litigation Star
- Volunteer for child and adult services activities aimed at integrating adults with developmental disabilities into their community
Directorships & Affiliations
- Canadian Bar Association
- Defense Research Institute (DRI)
Education & Admissions
- Co-Author “Encyclopaedia of International Commercial Litigation,” Wolters Kluwer, May 2021
- Commentaire sur la décision Dion c. Compagnie de services de financement Primus Canada – Éclaircissements de la Cour d’appel sur les représentations au consommateur et les dommages punitifs, Rachel April Giguère et Sidney Elbaz, Repères, avril 2015
- Commentaire sur les décisions Dubé c. Nissan Canada Finance, division de Nissan Canada inc.; Dion c. Compagnie de services de financement automobile Primus Canada; Daneau c. General Motors Acceptance Corporation du Canada ltée (GMAC); St-Pierre c. Banque Royale du Canada – Divulgation des frais dans les contrats types : mieux vaut être clair, Rachel April Giguère et Sidney Elbaz, Repères, janvier 2014
- Article 2779 C.c.Q. : quels coûts pour le créancier forcé d’abandonner son recours ? Commentaire sur la décision Canada (Procureur général) c. Caisse populaire St-Joseph de Bordeaux, Rachel April Giguère et Sidney Elbaz, Repères, septembre 2012
Insights by Sidney Elbaz (5 Posts)
EIn class actions, the right to examine an affiant is the subject of conflicting case law.
Join members of the Marketing and Advertising Group on Thursday, June 17, 2021 at 12 pm ET as we discuss current trends in marketing and advertising in an increasingly virtual world, and during the ongoing global pandemic.
Supreme Court of Canada confirms: hypothecary notices in Québec receiverships are here to stay.
Join us for McMillan’s Two Part Automotive Industry Webinar Series, and hear from speakers from Transport Canada, McMillan Vantage, and McMillan LLP on policy points, legislative updates, regulatory issues, and other important developments spanning the industry.
What Are “Moral Damages” Worth? Quebec Court of Appeal Limits when Consumers’ Frustration Constitutes a Recoverable Harm
The Quebec Court of Appeal's decision in Meubles Léon v. Options Consommateurs sheds light on when a "moral damage" is recoverable.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.