


Canada/China Patent Prosecution Highway Program: Three Years in Brief
Canada/China Patent Prosecution Highway Program: Three Years in Brief
Since September 1, 2013, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) and the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (“SIPO”) have been participating in a patent prosecution highway (“PPH”) pilot project, a project which in principle allows innovative entities to seek and achieve patent protection on both sides of the Pacific Ocean more quickly and more cost-effectively.
Generally, the PPH pilot project permits patent applicants to accelerate the examination of a corresponding second patent application in a second jurisdiction (the “second application”), based on the allowance or registration of a corresponding first patent application in a first jurisdiction (the “first application”). Under a PPH request, the patent office examining the second application takes into account (hopefully with a favourable view) the examination history of the first application. The Canadian patent office does not charge a fee for receiving PPH requests under the PPH pilot project between CIPO and SIPO.
The PPH pilot project between CIPO and SIPO has a current sunset date of August 31, 2018.[1] Based on data tabulated up to December 2016, the number of applications participating in the PPH pilot project between CIPO and SIPO has steadily increased since its inception[2]:
Year | Inbound PPH request (from China) |
Outbound PPH request (to China) |
2013 | 3 | 0 |
2014 | 17 | 4 |
2015 | 31 | 6 |
2016 | 66 | 17 |
This is a promising sign, and suggests that at least some Canadian and Chinese applicants are considering the potential benefits of the PPH pilot project between CIPO and SIPO.
Relative to other Asian jurisdictions like Japan and the Republic of Korea, however, the number of PPH requests coming from Chinese applicants pales in comparison both numerically and proportionally. Referring to the immediate past three years of 2014, 2015, 2016, and years where CIPO had PPH pilot projects in place with China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, the following number of inbound PPH requests from Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean applicants were reportedly received at CIPO[3]:
Year | Inbound PPH request (from China) | Inbound PPH request (from Japan) | Inbound PPH request (from South Korea) |
2014 | 17 | 132 | 37 |
2015 | 31 | 152 | 67 |
2016 | 66 | 669 | 201 |
Over approximately the same time period, the following inbound patent applications from Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean applicants were reported received at CIPO[4],[5],[6]:
Year | Inbound applications (from China) | Inbound applications (from Japan) | Inbound applications (from South Korea) |
2013-2014 | 528 | 1830 | 424 |
2014-2015 | 661 | 1903 | 352 |
2015-2016 | 672 | 1940 | 370 |
Insights (5 Posts)
Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith
Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award
Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.
Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections
Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.