Canadian Transportation Agency Closes Railway Capital Structure Consultation
Outcome Affects Regulatory Costing under the Maximum Revenue Entitlement Program, Regulated Interswitching and Final Offer Arbitration
The Canadian Transportation Agency recently invited submissions regarding a consultation on the methodology for determining the capital structure of Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and Canadian National Railway Company (CN) under the maximum revenue entitlement (MRE) program. The purpose of the consultation was for the determination of CN’s and CP’s cost of capital, an important component in not only the MRE, but also interswitching rates and other specified regulatory purposes, such as calculating long run variable costs in final offer arbitration proceedings.
In order to determine the cost of capital of CP and CN for a given year, the Agency establishes their respective capital structures, which identifies what proportion of their total invested capital is financed from debt, equity, and deferred taxes and investment tax credits. As it explains, the Agency “determines a cost rate for each source of financing, and weights each cost rate by its proportion in the capital structure. The cost of capital rate is the sum of the weighted cost rates.”
Submissions were invited on the specific items to be included in the determination of the capital structure and a methodology for determining the working capital allowance component of the capital structure.
McMillan made initial submissions on October 14, 2016 and second phase submissions on November 18, 2016 on behalf of Teck Resources (Canada’s single largest rail shipper), as well as the Western Grain Elevator Association and the Canadian Canola Growers Association. These submissions were supported by renowned regulatory finance expert, Dr. Lawrence I. Gould, Ph.D., Professor of Finance and Senior Scholar at the Asper Business School, University of Manitoba.
Apart from the submissions of the two Class I federal railway companies, CP and CN, that were the object of the consultation, four other shipper associations made submissions, all found on the Consultations Page of the Canadian Transportation Agency website
Submissions are now closed. The results of the Agency’s consultation process should appear in the Agency’s next Volume Related Composite Price Index determination, expected in April 2017.
by François Tougas
Louis Zivot, Lucia Stuhldreier, Ryan Gallagher, François Tougas – Co-Chair)
Strategy, Negotiations, Resolution
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Ontario (Might get the) Right to Repair – An overview of Bill 187 the Right to Repair Consumer Electronic Products, Household Appliances, Wheelchairs, Motor Vehicles and Farming Heavy Equipment Act, 2024
Ontario considers new right to repair legislation for consumer products and motor vehicles.
More Than Meets the Eye: The Legal Implications of British Columbia’s Agreement to Recognize Aboriginal Title Over Haida Gwaii
An analysis of legal implications related to the BC Government's agreement with the Haida Nation to recognize Aboriginal title over Haida Gwaii.
Lessons Learned from the TTC’s Ransomware Attack
Lessons learned from the recent investigation by the Ontario IPC into the effectiveness of the TTC's cybersecurity measures and ransomware attack response
Don’t Get Caught by Canada’s Patent Novelty Grace-Period
The key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.
Shifting Gears – Canada to Consider New Motor Vehicle Equipment Regulations to Help Prevent Auto Theft
Transport Canada announces plan to update safety standards to combat auto theft.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.