Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Canadian Transportation Agency Closes Railway Capital Structure Consultation

January 2017 Transportation Bulletin 2 minute read

Outcome Affects Regulatory Costing under the Maximum Revenue Entitlement Program, Regulated Interswitching and Final Offer Arbitration

The Canadian Transportation Agency recently invited submissions regarding a consultation on the methodology for determining the capital structure of Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) and Canadian National Railway Company (CN) under the maximum revenue entitlement (MRE) program. The purpose of the consultation was for the determination of CN’s and CP’s cost of capital, an important component in not only the MRE, but also interswitching rates and other specified regulatory purposes, such as calculating long run variable costs in final offer arbitration proceedings.

In order to determine the cost of capital of CP and CN for a given year, the Agency establishes their respective capital structures, which identifies what proportion of their total invested capital is financed from debt, equity, and deferred taxes and investment tax credits. As it explains, the Agency “determines a cost rate for each source of financing, and weights each cost rate by its proportion in the capital structure. The cost of capital rate is the sum of the weighted cost rates.”

Submissions were invited on the specific items to be included in the determination of the capital structure and a methodology for determining the working capital allowance component of the capital structure.

McMillan made initial submissions on October 14, 2016 and second phase submissions on November 18, 2016 on behalf of Teck Resources (Canada’s single largest rail shipper), as well as the Western Grain Elevator Association and the Canadian Canola Growers Association. These submissions were supported by renowned regulatory finance expert, Dr. Lawrence I. Gould, Ph.D., Professor of Finance and Senior Scholar at the Asper Business School, University of Manitoba.

Apart from the submissions of the two Class I federal railway companies, CP and CN, that were the object of the consultation, four other shipper associations made submissions, all found on the Consultations Page of the Canadian Transportation Agency website

Submissions are now closed.  The results of the Agency’s consultation process should appear in the Agency’s next Volume Related Composite Price Index determination, expected in April 2017.

by François Tougas

Louis Zivot, Lucia Stuhldreier, Ryan Gallagher, François Tougas – Co-Chair)

Strategy, Negotiations, Resolution

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2017

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

The Latest Risk to the BC Natural Resource Sector: Government Uses Little Known Law to Freeze Mining Rights Unless First Nations Consent

BC's government has issued unprecedented orders, to prohibit mining activity in certain areas, unless First Nations consent.

Read More
Mar 11, 2024
Featured Insight

Canada’s New Policies on Investments in the Interactive Digital Media Sector

On March 1, 2024, the Canadian government introduced new policies to increase scrutiny of foreign investments in Canada's Interactive Digital Media sector.

Read More
Mar 6, 2024
Featured Insight

Duty to Mitigate Part II – Revenge of the Job Offer

Ontario's Superior Court of Justice found that a terminated employee failed to mitigate by refusing to accept an offer of comparable employment.

Read More
Mar 5, 2024
Featured Insight

Storm Clouds Looming: The Impact of Competition Act Changes on Leasing

Our upcoming seminar will help tenants and landlords prepare for anti-competitive agreement changes under the Competition Act, as summarized in this bulletin

Read More
Mar 4, 2024
Featured Insight

A Word of Caution: Company Liable for Misrepresentations Made by Chatbot

Tribunal finds that a website chatbot is not a separate legal entity and holds company liable for the chatbot's misrepresentations.

Read More
Mar 4, 2024