


City of Toronto Introduces Garden Suites
City of Toronto Introduces Garden Suites
In our previous bulletin we discussed key benefits and challenges of laneway housing in Canada, focusing on their growth in popularity in the City of Toronto (the “City”). In addition to laneway housing, the City has now started the process to permit landowners to construct “garden suites” in areas designated as “Neighbourhoods” under the City’s Official Plan (“OP”),[1] providing further opportunity for increasing the City’s limited housing supply.
Recently, the City initiated the process to amend its OP and Zoning By-Law 569-2013 to allow garden suites to be built on Neighbourhood-designated lands. The draft OP Amendment (“OPA 554”) is found here, and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment (“ZBA”) is found here. A garden suite is generally a smaller detached structure and separate rental housing unit located in the backyard of a residential lot, and is defined in draft OPA 554 as:
“a self-contained residential unit, subordinate to a primary dwelling, in which both kitchen and bathroom facilities are provided, and which is located on a lot within an ancillary building that is not adjacent to a public laneway.”[2]
The draft ZBA expressly states “[a] laneway suite is not a garden suite” – the key difference being that a garden suite does not abut (i.e., border) a lane.[3] Like laneway houses, however, garden suites are “non-severable”; that is, they remain part of the property upon which they are built.[4]
Per the City Planning Final Report to the Planning and Housing Committee dated December 21, 2021, the proposed amendments to permit garden suites is, in part, a response to Planning Act amendments requiring authorization in municipalities’ official plans of additional residential units on certain lots, and is also an outcome of the Garden Suites Study, which is part of the City’s Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) work program. As discussed in our earlier bulletin on laneway suites, garden suites are being proposed in order to fill the “missing middle” in Toronto’s neighbourhoods, diversifying the types of housing available to the City’s residents.[5] Like laneway suites, the proposed OPA and ZBA regarding garden suites set out particular use and development standards to ensure minimal resulting impacts, including to health, safety and the environment. Anyone considering building a garden suite on their property should, carefully consult the final form of such documents once in force, as well as work with consultants with expertise in design, planning and the application and permitting process.
Notably, the statutory public meeting for consultation in respect of these proposed amendments is scheduled to be held this Wednesday, January 12, 2022. Stakeholders interested in, or who have concerns with, the proposed amendments may make oral or written submissions at the meeting, which will then be considered by Council in its decision to approve or reject the proposed amendments, or require further studies. For more information respecting the approvals process and timing, please see the Province’s guide here, or reach out to the authors for more information.
If you are looking for expert advice navigating the expanding housing options in the City of Toronto and related rules and regulations, including application processes, understanding development fees, or financing, please reach out to the authors of this bulletin to discover how McMillan LLP’s real estate, construction, municipal and land use planning, and capital markets teams can assist.
[1] See City of Toronto, “Garden Suites” (last visited 7 January 2022), online: Toronto.
[2] See page 2 of OPA 554.
[3] See page 1 of ZBA 569-2013.
[4] See City of Toronto, “Garden Suites” (last visited 7 January 2022), online: Toronto.
[5] See City of Toronto, “Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods” (last visited 7 January 2022), online: Toronto.
by Kailey Sutton, Alex Bruvels and Madeline Klimek (Student-At-Law)
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2022
Insights (5 Posts)
Competition Bureau Challenges Alleged Drip Pricing by Cineplex
The Competition Bureau commenced a proceeding against Cineplex for allegedly engaging in misleading advertising in the form of "drip pricing".
The Present and Future of A.I. Regulation
Join us for a session with industry experts who will share valuable insights into the latest trends and developments in artificial intelligence with a particular focus on regulation.
Secured Lending in Canada: A Guide for U.S. Lenders
A guide to secured lending in Canada; summarizes regulatory matters, tax, security, insolvency and restructuring issues in Canada.
Don’t Wing It – Implications for Project Proponents under Canada’s Species at Risk Act
This bulletin discusses the application of the Species at Risk Act, a federal environmental statute whose potential impact on private parties is overlooked.
Bill 112: The Hazel McCallion Act, 2023 and Potential Impacts of the Proposed Dissolution of the Peel Region
On May 18, 2023, Ontario passed Bill 112 proposing the dissolution of Peel Region, and similar legislation could impact other regions in the near future.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.