Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Overtime class actions – leave to appeal denied

March 2013 Employment and Labour Bulletin < 1 read

In June 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal released two decisions allowing class action lawsuits to proceed against major Canadian banks: Fresco v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 2012 ONCA 444 (CanLII); and Fulawka v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 2012 ONCA 443 (CanLII). See our previous bulletin – “overtime class actions given the green light”, July 2012.

As noted in our prior bulletin, in Fresco and Fulawka class members alleged that the overtime policies and practices of their employer (or former employer) violated the Canada Labour Code, as well as pleading causes of action in breach of contract, tort and unjust enrichment. In both cases, the Court of Appeal was prepared to grant certification on the grounds that there were allegedly systemic issues, shared by all class members, with the employer’s overtime policies.

The defendants in both Fresco and Fulawka sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”). On March 21, 2013, the SCC denied leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decisions. Therefore, these two class action lawsuits will likely proceed to trial unless they are settled by the parties in the interim.

Class action lawsuits are notoriously lengthy and expensive, even if the defendants are successful at the end of the day. Therefore, even though these cases have not yet been decided on their merits, they serve as an important reminder for employers to ensure that their overtime policies and practices comply with applicable laws and contracts.

by Lyndsay A. Wasser

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2013

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Details
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023