


Changes to Ontario’s Franchise Legislation: Bill 154 Receives Royal Assent
Changes to Ontario’s Franchise Legislation: Bill 154 Receives Royal Assent
In October 2017, we updated you on changes to Ontario’s Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Legislation), 2000 (the “Arthur Wishart Act”) proposed through Bill 154, the Cutting Unnecessary Red Tape Act, 2017. Bill 154 received royal assent on November 14, 2017, formally amending the Arthur Wishart Act.
The highlights of the changes to the Arthur Wishart Act as a result of Bill 154, now having received royal assent, are:
- Amending the definition of “franchise” to include relationships where the franchisor has the right to exercise control, rather than the actual exercise of control, over the franchisee’s method of operation;
- Allowing franchisors to accept fully refundable deposits that do not exceed a prescribed amount (the prescribed amount is expected to be 20% of the initial franchise fee, as in British Columbia) without triggering the disclosure document obligation;
- Allowing franchisors to enter into non-disclosure and location agreements with prospective franchisees without triggering the disclosure document obligation (Ontario is currently the only regulated province that does not permit non-disclosure agreements to be signed before delivering a disclosure document);
- Expanding the scope of the disclosure exemption to include the grant of a franchise to a person (or a company controlled by that person) who is currently an officer or director of the franchisor (or who was an officer or director of the franchisor up to four months prior to the relevant time); and
- Clarifying the “large investment” and “de minimis investment” disclosure exemptions to clarify timing and the method of calculating the relevant investment amount.
Some of the amendments to the Arthur Wishart Act came into force immediately upon royal assent of Bill 154, including those amendments changing the definition of “Franchise”. The other amendments will come into force on a day to be named by proclamation.
by W. Brad Hanna, FCIArb., Cara Zacks
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Related Publications
Ontario Court of Appeal Interprets the TSX’s Majority Voting Requirement, Considers the Oppression Remedy, and Clarifies Set-off Rights
Apr 16, 2021A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal interprets the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) requirement that listed companies adopt a majority voting policy.
Commercial Landlord and Tenant Insolvencies: The Need to Know for Sub-tenants
Apr 13, 2021As the COVID-19 pandemic continues on, it is particularly important for sub-tenants and landlords to consider the ramifications of an insolvent head-tenant.
Upcoming Changes to Ontario’s Auto Insurance Regime
Apr 12, 2021The regulation of Ontario’s auto insurance market may undergo several key changes to enhance consumer
protection and foster greater competition and innovation.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Privacy Overview
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.