Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Reduction of Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) Recapture Rate for Ontario Portion of HST (“OHST”) starting July 1, 2015

July 2015 Tax Bulletin 2 minute read

Generally, “large businesses”[1] are subject to the ITC recapture of the OHST portion paid on expenses relating to the acquisition of (i) motor vehicles for use on public roads (excluding for re-sale or lease), (ii) motor fuel for such vehicles, (ii) certain energy products, (iii) certain telecommunication services, and (v) food, beverages and entertainment that are restricted by 50% income tax deductibility and ITC availability. While the recapture of ITCs is contrary to the scheme of a value-added tax, by which businesses that engage in taxable activities can generally claim ITCs to recover the taxes paid on business inputs, it was intended as a temporary measure to help the Ontario Government eliminate its deficit.

Reduction in OHST ITC Recapture Rate

Starting on July 1, 2015 (last week), the OHST ITC recapture rate was reduced from 100% to 75%, as part of an incremental, 3-year phase out of this temporary recapture regime. The recapture rate will be further reduced from 75% to 50% on July 1, 2016, from 50% to 25% on July 1, 2017, and will be eliminated entirely on July 1, 2018. To ensure appropriate net recovery of OHST, large businesses will need to monitor these changes to the ITC recapture rules and adjust their GST/HST accounting and reporting accordingly. In certain circumstances, a large business may be required to report OHST ITC recapture on a GST/HST return at multiple or different recapture rates.

Correcting OHST ITC Recapture Errors

If after the 25% reduction in the recapture rate on July 1, 2015, a large business continues to use the old 100% recapture rate where not applicable, then, to recover the excess net tax (ITC recapture) remitted in error (the “Excess Amount“) for a particular reporting period, the business should claim a rebate from Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA“) to recover the Excess Amount within two years of remittance, unless CRA has already assessed the reporting period. In that case, a Notice of Objection should be filed within 90 days of the assessment to seek reversal of the Excess Amount assessed.

Missing the two-year claim period, or as applicable, the 90-day period within which to object, could result in the business being unable to recover the Excess Tax remitted. Although the business could request that CRA (re-) assess the applicable reporting period(s) within the normal four-year assessment period to recoup the Excess Tax, CRA would be under no obligation to adhere to the request to audit and process the request.

by Jamie Wilks and Carl Irvine

1 Generally, a person, whose annual taxable supplies made in Canada (or made outside Canada through a permanent establishment in Canada) exceed $10 million, is a “large business”. This threshold is calculated with reference to taxable supplies made by any associated persons. Irrespective of whether this $10 million threshold is exceeded, certain financial institutions are large businesses, if they are registrants for GST/HST purposes. Public service bodies, as defined, and certain government entities are not considered large businesses.

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2015

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Trademark of Foreign Owner Invalidated on the Basis of Bad Faith

Awareness of a senior rights holder’s trademark and its prior use of such trademark in Canada is relevant to the assessment of bad faith.

Read More
Mar 22, 2023
Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Details
Wednesday, April 19, 2023