Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Regulations Implementing theTransportation Modernization Act

April 2019 Transportation Bulletin 2 minute read

On April 1, 2019, the Canadian Transportation Agency (“Agency”) announced the publication of proposed regulations (the “Proposed Regulations”) in the Canada Gazette to implement certain aspects of the Transportation Modernization Act (Bill C-49) (“TMA”). This bulletin analyzes the Agency’s proposals in light of our representations.

The TMA amended the Canada Transportation Act (the “Act”) as of May 23, 2018.  Many stakeholders made representations regarding the TMA before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities and the Senate Standing Committee on Transportation and Communications. Our representations are found here, here, here and here.

In May of 2016, the Agency launched its Regulatory Modernization Initiative (“RMI”) and in June of 2018 circulated its Discussion Paper on Regulatory Modernization for Rail Transportation seeking submissions.  On behalf of Teck Resources Limited and its affiliates, we made submissions regarding the rail transportation portion of the RMI, which were supported by the Western Grain Elevator Association, the Canadian Canola Growers Association, the Western Canadian Shippers Coalition and the Mining Association of Canada.

The Proposed Regulations would amend:

  • the Railway Interswitching Regulations to remove interswitching rates, which will now be determined annually by Agency decision (for example, see Agency Determination No. R-2018-254), rather than by a regulation.
  • the Canadian Transportation Agency Designated Provisions Regulations to broaden the range of rail-related requirements in the Act the Agency can enforce by imposing administrative monetary penalties payable to the federal government.
  • the Railway Third Party Liability Insurance Coverage Regulations to prescribe information that rail service providers  must submit to the Agency when applying for or seeking to vary certificates of fitness and to require them to update that information on an annual basis.

The Proposed Regulations are as important for what they do not do. For example, the Agency considered changing the Railway Costing Regulations, but the Proposed Regulations would not change them at this time. Instead, the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (“RIAS”) confirms that the Agency will be consulting with interested stakeholders in respect of interswitching rate-setting methodology and the Railway Costing Regulations later in 2019. Further, the RIAS confirms that the Agency will not consolidate its rail regulations into a single regulation.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you wish to set up a private briefing to discuss the Proposed Regulations or any other matter relating to the TMA or the Act.

by Ryan Gallagher, Lucia Stuhldreier and François Tougas

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Details
Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023