Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
On August 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada denied the application brought by three municipalities (the “Municipalities”) seeking leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Northern Sunrise County v Virginia Hills Oil Corp, 2019 ABCA 61. The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that the Alberta Municipal Government Act (the “Act”) does not grant a municipality a special lien for unpaid linear property taxes.
At the Alberta Court of Appeal the Municipalities sought a declaration that their claims for linear property tax arrears against two bankrupt companies, Virginia Hills Oil Corp. and Dolomite Energy Corp., granted the Municipalities a special lien against the companies which would make the Municipalities secured creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Court of Appeal found that unpaid linear property taxes, which are taxes levied against linear property such as electric power systems, street lighting systems, telecommunications systems and pipelines, could not form a special lien against the assessed party under the Act. This decision is therefore of considerable importance to participants in the Alberta oil and gas industry, including receivers, trustees, municipalities and secured lenders. Administration of a number of bankruptcy cases will likely finally proceed now that the Supreme Court has provided certainty with respect to the treatment of these types of municipal tax claims. All stakeholders will benefit from the clear finding that claims for linear property tax arrears are unsecured in a bankruptcy.
McMillan successfully represented The Bank of Nova Scotia, as agent for the senior lenders to Virginia Hills Oil Corp. which was a respondent in this appeal.
by Kourtney Rylands
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2019
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Ontario (Might get the) Right to Repair – An overview of Bill 187 the Right to Repair Consumer Electronic Products, Household Appliances, Wheelchairs, Motor Vehicles and Farming Heavy Equipment Act, 2024
Ontario considers new right to repair legislation for consumer products and motor vehicles.
More Than Meets the Eye: The Legal Implications of British Columbia’s Agreement to Recognize Aboriginal Title Over Haida Gwaii
An analysis of legal implications related to the BC Government's agreement with the Haida Nation to recognize Aboriginal title over Haida Gwaii.
Lessons Learned from the TTC’s Ransomware Attack
Lessons learned from the recent investigation by the Ontario IPC into the effectiveness of the TTC's cybersecurity measures and ransomware attack response
Don’t Get Caught by Canada’s Patent Novelty Grace-Period
The key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.
Shifting Gears – Canada to Consider New Motor Vehicle Equipment Regulations to Help Prevent Auto Theft
Transport Canada announces plan to update safety standards to combat auto theft.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.