Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
On August 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada denied the application brought by three municipalities (the “Municipalities”) seeking leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Northern Sunrise County v Virginia Hills Oil Corp, 2019 ABCA 61. The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that the Alberta Municipal Government Act (the “Act”) does not grant a municipality a special lien for unpaid linear property taxes.
At the Alberta Court of Appeal the Municipalities sought a declaration that their claims for linear property tax arrears against two bankrupt companies, Virginia Hills Oil Corp. and Dolomite Energy Corp., granted the Municipalities a special lien against the companies which would make the Municipalities secured creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Court of Appeal found that unpaid linear property taxes, which are taxes levied against linear property such as electric power systems, street lighting systems, telecommunications systems and pipelines, could not form a special lien against the assessed party under the Act. This decision is therefore of considerable importance to participants in the Alberta oil and gas industry, including receivers, trustees, municipalities and secured lenders. Administration of a number of bankruptcy cases will likely finally proceed now that the Supreme Court has provided certainty with respect to the treatment of these types of municipal tax claims. All stakeholders will benefit from the clear finding that claims for linear property tax arrears are unsecured in a bankruptcy.
McMillan successfully represented The Bank of Nova Scotia, as agent for the senior lenders to Virginia Hills Oil Corp. which was a respondent in this appeal.
by Kourtney Rylands
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2019
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Federal Court Orders CRA to “Reconsider” an Assessment: Milgram Foundation v Canada (Attorney-General), 2024 FC 1405
Comment on Federal Court decision in Milgram Foundation—a remarkable victory by a taxpayer against the Canada Revenue Agency.
Watch your Warnings – The Québec Court of Appeal Sets the Bar High
Québec Court of Appeal decision which clarifies the manufacturer, supplier and distributor's obligation to provide proper warnings and information to consumers.
Canada Expands Interim Measures and Disclosure Powers for Foreign Investment National Security Reviews
As of September 3, 2024, the Government has new powers it can use when conducting national security reviews under the Investment Canada Act
OSFI’s First Industry Day: Key Highlights and Takeaways
On September 5, 2024, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions hosted its inaugural virtual Industry Day.
The Top 5 Things you probably are not doing (but should be doing) to comply with Canadian Privacy Laws: ISSUE #4: Responding to Data Subject Requests the Right Way
Under Canadian privacy laws, individuals have certain rights with respect to their personal information.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.