Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
Supreme Court of Canada Denies Leave to Appeal in “Virginia Hills” Linear Property Tax Case: Northern Sunrise County, et al. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, et al., 2019 SCC 38587
On August 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada denied the application brought by three municipalities (the “Municipalities”) seeking leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Northern Sunrise County v Virginia Hills Oil Corp, 2019 ABCA 61. The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that the Alberta Municipal Government Act (the “Act”) does not grant a municipality a special lien for unpaid linear property taxes.
At the Alberta Court of Appeal the Municipalities sought a declaration that their claims for linear property tax arrears against two bankrupt companies, Virginia Hills Oil Corp. and Dolomite Energy Corp., granted the Municipalities a special lien against the companies which would make the Municipalities secured creditors under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Court of Appeal found that unpaid linear property taxes, which are taxes levied against linear property such as electric power systems, street lighting systems, telecommunications systems and pipelines, could not form a special lien against the assessed party under the Act. This decision is therefore of considerable importance to participants in the Alberta oil and gas industry, including receivers, trustees, municipalities and secured lenders. Administration of a number of bankruptcy cases will likely finally proceed now that the Supreme Court has provided certainty with respect to the treatment of these types of municipal tax claims. All stakeholders will benefit from the clear finding that claims for linear property tax arrears are unsecured in a bankruptcy.
McMillan successfully represented The Bank of Nova Scotia, as agent for the senior lenders to Virginia Hills Oil Corp. which was a respondent in this appeal.
by Kourtney Rylands
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2019
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Capital Gains Confusion: Navigating the Options for Reporting Employee Stock Option Benefits
This bulletin discusses proposed tax changes that will increase certain source withholding obligations for stock option benefits.
Bill 68 and Medical Certificates: Important New Provisions for Employers
Certain provisions of Bill 68 affect employers and the circumstances under which they may ask their employees to provide a medical certificate.
Clear as Mud: Analyzing Voluntary Property Control Removals So Far
The Competition Bureau's recent announcement about a grocer agreeing to remove a exclusive/restrictive covenant raises more questions than answers.
Patent Term Adjustments in Canada Are Here
On January 1, 2025, provisions related to Canada’s new patent term adjustment framework came into force. This bulletin provides an overview of these changes.
New Compliance Requirements for Québec Financial Institutions: Overview of the Regulation respecting the management and reporting of information security incidents by certain financial institutions and by credit assessment agents
In this bulletin, we go over new legal obligations imposed on financial institutions relating to information security incidents.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.