


TSX Adoption of Amendments – Majority Voting Requirement
TSX Adoption of Amendments – Majority Voting Requirement
On February 13, 2014, the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) approved amendments (the “Amendments”) to the TSX Company Manual that require each director of a TSX listed issuer to be elected by a majority (50% + 1 vote) of the votes cast with respect to his or her election other than at contested meetings (the “Majority Voting Requirement”) where the number of directors nominated for election is greater than the number of seats available on the board. The Amendments are intended to improve corporate governance standards in Canada by providing a meaningful way for security holders to hold individual directors accountable.
The Amendments, first proposed for comment on October 4, 2012, supplement a number of corporate governance rule changes made by the TSX in 2012, and will take effect on June 30, 2014. Issuers with fiscal years ending on or after June 30, 2014 must comply with the Amendments at their first annual meeting following such date.
Overview of Changes
Pursuant to the Amendments:
- A listed issuer must implement a majority voting policy (a “Policy”) unless it satisfies the Majority Voting Requirement in another manner acceptable to the TSX (for example, by applicable statutes, articles or by-laws).
- Any director who is not elected by at least a majority of the votes cast must immediately tender his or her resignation to the board of directors and:
- within 90 days of the applicable shareholders’ meeting, the board shall determine whether or not to accept the resignation;
- the resignation, effective when accepted by the board, shall be accepted absent “exceptional circumstances” (the TSX has not provided guidance on the interpretation of this beyond acknowledging that the board is best positioned to make this determination);
- a director who tenders a resignation will not participate in any meeting of the board or any sub-committee of the board at which the resignation is considered;
- the listed issuer shall promptly issue a news release with the board’s decision and provide the TSX with a copy; and
- provided that the board determines not to accept a resignation, the news release must fully state the reasons for that decision.
- An issuer who adopts a Policy must fully describe the Policy on an annual basis in its materials sent to security holders in connection with a meeting at which directors are being elected.
Issuers that are majority controlled are exempt from the Majority Voting Requirement but must disclose reliance on such exemption annually in their proxy materials and their reasons for not adopting majority voting.
Implications
TSX listed issuers that have not previously adopted a Policy will now be required to do so. Issuers that have already adopted a Policy prior to the Amendments should review the terms of such policy to ensure compliance with the new rules.
by Daniel Lau and Denise Lo, Student at Law
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2014
Insights (5 Posts)
Is Your Arbitration Clause Appealing? No Appeal Available where Clause Says Dispute is “Finally Settled” by Arbitration
The Ontario Court of Appeal considers the type of language in a dispute resolution clause which precludes the right to appeal an arbitration award.
Clocking In and Opting Out: Quebec CAI Issues Warning About Biometric Time Clocks in the Workplace
Following CAI's recent observations, this bulletin provides guidance to comply with the applicable requirements to implement biometric time clocks in Quebec.
Copyright Board Modernizes Royalty Tariff-Setting Procedures for Users
The Copyright Board of Canada has completed Phase 1 of its Modernization Initiative to improve its royalty tariff-setting procedures for collectives and users.
Environmental Priorities in Insolvency Proceedings and the Impact on Lenders: Alberta Court Broadens Redwater Principles
Alberta case Qualex v 12-10 Capital develops line of cases at the intersection of environmental protection and bankruptcy and insolvency law in Canada.
Bill C-13: The Federal Government’s Answer to Bill 96, Notably Imposes New Obligations to Use French in Workplaces for Federal Employers
Bill C-13 - French language requirements for federally regulated businesses in Canada
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.