Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise
Woman making a frame around the sun with her hands at sunrise

Updates to the Bail-In Regime: Depositor Accounts

May 2016 Financial Services Bulletin < 1 read

Earlier this week, we published a bulletin describing the introduction of Bill C-15 entitled An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2016 and other measures to, among other things, implement the proposed bail-in regime.

In the bulletin, we discussed potential concerns with respect to whether consumer deposits would be part of the eligible debt responsible for bailing-in a bank (one of the most frequently asked questions regarding the bail-in regime). We noted that these concerns were raised when the previous Conservative Government discussed introducing a bail-in regime and that the Minister of Finance denied that depositors’ accounts would be subject to the bail-in regime.

There is no indication from the current Liberal government that this position has changed. In a recent FAQ on the bail-in amendment (available here) the Canadian Bankers Association has also stated that “The government has made it very clear on numerous occasions that it will not be including bank customers’ deposits as part of the bail-in regime.” The final details on what will or will not be subject to the regime will of course be set out in the regulations, once issued. However, for now it seems reasonable to conclude that consumer deposits will not be part of the eligible debt obligations that could be converted to equity to bail-in a bank.

by Darcy Ammerman, Pat Forgione, Rob Scavone and Jennifer Allman, Student-at-Law

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Related Publications (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Another Franchisor Freshly Squeezed by Material Deficiencies in its Disclosure Document

The Court in Freshly Squeezed applied the Raibex test to determine what deficiencies in disclosure entitle a
franchisee to the two-year rescission remedy.

Read More
Jun 14, 2021
Featured Insight

June 2021 Update: British Columbia’s New Registry of Beneficial Ownership

Now that the Land Owner Transparency Registry is searchable by the public, it is important to understand the scope of its use, and its current limitations.

Read More
Jun 14, 2021
Featured Insight

Québec Class action – What’s new? Examination of the defendant at the authorization stage

EIn class actions, the right to examine an affiant is the subject of conflicting case law.

Read More
Jun 14, 2021
Featured Insight

CERB Payments Deductible from Wrongful Dismissal Damages

BC Supreme Court for the first time considers whether CERB payments would constitute mitigation earnings in the context of a wrongful dismissal.

Read More
Jun 11, 2021
Featured Insight

COVID-19-related Layoffs Not Grounds for Constructive Dismissal

An Ontario Superior Court of Justice judge has ruled that a temporary layoff related to COVID-19 is not grounds for constructive dismissal.

Read More
Jun 11, 2021