Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Will the Government of Canada Extend the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act?

April 2016 Transportation Bulletin < 1 read

On April 22, 2016, the Government of Canada announced its intention to work with Parliament to postpone for one year the repeal of certain provisions of the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act, which amended the Canada Transportation Act (the “CTA”) to:

  • allow Cabinet to require Canadian National Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Company to move minimum quantities of certain grain commodities within specified time periods, subject to administrative monetary penalties for failure; and
  • empower the Canadian Transportation Agency to
    • require a federal railway company to compensate any person for expenses suffered as a result of that railway company’s failure to fulfill its service obligations to that person;
    • extend the regulated interswitching limits from 30 kilometres to 160 kilometres within certain geographic areas or specified commodities only (so far, the Agency has done so for all commodities in the three prairie provinces); and
    • make regulations specifying what constitutes “operational terms” for the purposes of service level arbitrations under the CTA.

The announcement indicates that the postponement is intended to allow interested parties to proceed under a predictable regulatory scheme while the Minister of Transport considers recommendations made in the recently released report (discussed here) in respect of the 2015 statutory review of the CTA. In the absence of such a postponement, the relevant provisions of the CTA would be repealed on August 1, 2016. Extending the legislation would require approval of both the House of Commons and the Senate.

by François Tougas and Ryan Gallagher

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Do You See What I See? Fake AI Cases Can Result in Real Contempt

Reliance on an AI hallucinated case in submissions to the court can constitute a breach of professional obligations and may amount to contempt.

Read More
May 11, 2025
Featured Insight

Canada’s Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act: Where to next for companies?

Join subject matter experts from McMillan and Pillar Two for a webinar to support companies in addressing their forced labour, child labour and other modern slavery risks, and to support their reporting obligations under the Canadian Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act.

Details
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Featured Insight

Why Extended Producer Responsibility and the Circular Economy Demand Boardroom Action

Discussion of global amendments to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and right to repair laws, impacting product lifecycle management and regulatory compliance for businesses.

Read More
May 6, 2025
Featured Insight

Québec’s Bill 96: Where we are now after four years and the road ahead

Join Enda Wong, Business Law, Shari Munk-Manel, Employment & Labour Relations, and Émile Catimel-Marchand, Financial Services and Regulatory as they discuss Bill 96, its impacts on the day-to-day operations of companies doing business in Québec, including in the areas of employment, contracting, product design, labelling and advertising.

May 5, 2025
Featured Insight

Put Your Best Foot Forward: New Evidence Requirements for Trademark Appeals

Discussion of amendments to Canada's Trademarks Act impacting timing of delivery of evidence to the Trademark Opposition Board or later to the Federal Courts.

Read More
Apr 30, 2025