Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Confession, Cooperation, and Compliance: Mitigating Consequences of Alleged Bribery and Corruption Through Self-Reporting

November 23, 2021 Litigation Bulletin 3 minute read

The RCMP recently announced a rising trend of companies self-reporting potential acts of bribery and corruption. This trend was sparked by Canada’s 2018 adoption of remediation agreements, a deferred prosecution agreement regime under Canada’s Criminal Code. As quickly as a few days after the new regime took effect, the RCMP received a confession of corporate crime leading to the opening of an investigation file. This trend has since continued as parties offer their cooperation to authorities with an aim of promoting out-of-court settlement. Remediation agreements encourage cooperation from companies to address alleged corporate malfeasance using pre-trial alternatives such as acknowledging conduct, paying a penalty, and adopting prescribed conditions to avoid criminal prosecution.

Inspector Denis Beaudoin (National Division Sensitive and International Investigations, RCMP) has announced that several Canadian companies are self-reporting to demonstrate significant proactive cooperation, in the hopes of benefiting from lenient treatment under a remediation agreement. In reference to the frequency of self-reports, Inspector Beaudoin highlighted, “going from pretty much none before September, 2018, [when the law came into effect] to where we have them every year now.”[1]

Companies Self-report to Avoid Criminal Conviction

Companies self-report misconduct with an aim of avoiding criminal prosecution. By cooperating and volunteering information about a potential economic crime, companies can help authorities end the illegal conduct, while avoiding the consequences of a criminal conviction.

This upsurge of self-reporting in Canada is consistent with the experience of similar regimes in other countries (see our previous commentary on international deferred prosecution regimes here and here.) In Canada, a criminal conviction stands to do more damage than merely reputational damage, such as being prohibited from bidding on government contracts under federal and provincial integrity regimes. Remediation agreements, on the other hand, can involve partaking in governance reforms, paying significant penalties, and providing ongoing assistance to authorities – while allowing the company to avoid the negative collateral consequences of a criminal conviction.

Bribery and Corruption Patterns Lead to Investigations

According to Inspector Beaudoin, voluntary reports tend to surface when new management become suspicious about the legitimacy of certain historical payments and in turn notify the RCMP. Many of these illicit activities follow a pattern of a corporation funneling money through subcontractors, who then use those funds to bribe a government official with an aim of guaranteeing government contracts. Inspector Beaudoin also specifies that the bulk of the RCMP’s investigations around allegations of corruption and bribery mostly involve businesses in the mining, engineering, and construction industries.

Self-reporting Facilitates More Efficient Investigations

The prospect of mitigated consequences significantly helps to reduce the prevalence of “untouchable” conduct. Investigating alleged bribery and corruption involves a huge investment of government resources – money, labour, and time.

Nonetheless, Inspector Beaudoin stresses that even with a company’s cooperation, it can take three or four years to reach the stage where a remediation agreement will become available to the self-reporting company. An absence of cooperation stands to prolong this timeline significantly. According the Sergeant Guy-Michel Nkili, an investigator of international corruption cases with the RCMP, cooperation “changes the tone of the relationship with the company” and “facilitates [investigative] work”, including gaining “access to witnesses and documents” and makes a significant difference for witness interviews, search warrants, and international assistance requests.[2]

As of the publication date of this bulletin, prosecutors from the Public Prosecution Service of Canada have yet to present an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement to a single company. However, on September 23, 2021, provincial prosecutors in Quebec offered SNC-Lavalin Inc. and SNC-Lavalin International Inc. an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement after being charged under the Criminal Code for fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud between 1997 and 2004 in connection with the refurbishment of the Jacques Cartier Bridge. This marks the first time that a Canadian company has received such an invitation.

RCMP’s Call-to-Action

The RCMP urges businesses to self-report when they make internal discoveries of bribery or corruption. The RCMP also seeks to emphasize that a corporation’s lawyer can phone the RCMP on a “no-names” basis to get a sense of what options are available to companies that self-report misconduct, describing it as a practically “risk-free” means of understanding options for managing these circumstances.

McMillan’s White Collar Defence group is well equipped to advise companies with respect to contemplation of self-reporting alleged bribery or corruption activity.

[1] See Robert Fife and Steven Chase, “RCMP say Canadian companies are now self-reporting allegations of bribery”, The Globe and Mail (November 10, 2021).
[2] Vincent Larouche, “De Plus en Plus D’Entreprises se Dénoncent Elles-Mêmes“, La Presse+ (11 novembre 2021), (translated into English).

by Guy PinsonnaultJamieson D. Virgin, Chris Scheitterlein, and Anika Klassen (Articling Student)

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2021

Insights (5 Posts)

Featured Insight

Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.

On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.

Read More
Mar 20, 2023
Featured Insight

Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award

Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.

Read More
Mar 16, 2023
Featured Insight

Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections

Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.

Wednesday, April 19, 2023
Featured Insight

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”

Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.

Read More
Mar 15, 2023