Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

Confession, Cooperation, and Compliance: Mitigating Consequences of Alleged Bribery and Corruption Through Self-Reporting

November 23, 2021 Litigation Bulletin 3 minute read

The RCMP recently announced a rising trend of companies self-reporting potential acts of bribery and corruption. This trend was sparked by Canada’s 2018 adoption of remediation agreements, a deferred prosecution agreement regime under Canada’s Criminal Code. As quickly as a few days after the new regime took effect, the RCMP received a confession of corporate crime leading to the opening of an investigation file. This trend has since continued as parties offer their cooperation to authorities with an aim of promoting out-of-court settlement. Remediation agreements encourage cooperation from companies to address alleged corporate malfeasance using pre-trial alternatives such as acknowledging conduct, paying a penalty, and adopting prescribed conditions to avoid criminal prosecution.

Inspector Denis Beaudoin (National Division Sensitive and International Investigations, RCMP) has announced that several Canadian companies are self-reporting to demonstrate significant proactive cooperation, in the hopes of benefiting from lenient treatment under a remediation agreement. In reference to the frequency of self-reports, Inspector Beaudoin highlighted, “going from pretty much none before September, 2018, [when the law came into effect] to where we have them every year now.”[1]

Companies Self-report to Avoid Criminal Conviction

Companies self-report misconduct with an aim of avoiding criminal prosecution. By cooperating and volunteering information about a potential economic crime, companies can help authorities end the illegal conduct, while avoiding the consequences of a criminal conviction.

This upsurge of self-reporting in Canada is consistent with the experience of similar regimes in other countries (see our previous commentary on international deferred prosecution regimes here and here.) In Canada, a criminal conviction stands to do more damage than merely reputational damage, such as being prohibited from bidding on government contracts under federal and provincial integrity regimes. Remediation agreements, on the other hand, can involve partaking in governance reforms, paying significant penalties, and providing ongoing assistance to authorities – while allowing the company to avoid the negative collateral consequences of a criminal conviction.

Bribery and Corruption Patterns Lead to Investigations

According to Inspector Beaudoin, voluntary reports tend to surface when new management become suspicious about the legitimacy of certain historical payments and in turn notify the RCMP. Many of these illicit activities follow a pattern of a corporation funneling money through subcontractors, who then use those funds to bribe a government official with an aim of guaranteeing government contracts. Inspector Beaudoin also specifies that the bulk of the RCMP’s investigations around allegations of corruption and bribery mostly involve businesses in the mining, engineering, and construction industries.

Self-reporting Facilitates More Efficient Investigations

The prospect of mitigated consequences significantly helps to reduce the prevalence of “untouchable” conduct. Investigating alleged bribery and corruption involves a huge investment of government resources – money, labour, and time.

Nonetheless, Inspector Beaudoin stresses that even with a company’s cooperation, it can take three or four years to reach the stage where a remediation agreement will become available to the self-reporting company. An absence of cooperation stands to prolong this timeline significantly. According the Sergeant Guy-Michel Nkili, an investigator of international corruption cases with the RCMP, cooperation “changes the tone of the relationship with the company” and “facilitates [investigative] work”, including gaining “access to witnesses and documents” and makes a significant difference for witness interviews, search warrants, and international assistance requests.[2]

As of the publication date of this bulletin, prosecutors from the Public Prosecution Service of Canada have yet to present an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement to a single company. However, on September 23, 2021, provincial prosecutors in Quebec offered SNC-Lavalin Inc. and SNC-Lavalin International Inc. an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement after being charged under the Criminal Code for fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud between 1997 and 2004 in connection with the refurbishment of the Jacques Cartier Bridge. This marks the first time that a Canadian company has received such an invitation.

RCMP’s Call-to-Action

The RCMP urges businesses to self-report when they make internal discoveries of bribery or corruption. The RCMP also seeks to emphasize that a corporation’s lawyer can phone the RCMP on a “no-names” basis to get a sense of what options are available to companies that self-report misconduct, describing it as a practically “risk-free” means of understanding options for managing these circumstances.

McMillan’s White Collar Defence group is well equipped to advise companies with respect to contemplation of self-reporting alleged bribery or corruption activity.

[1] See Robert Fife and Steven Chase, “RCMP say Canadian companies are now self-reporting allegations of bribery”, The Globe and Mail (November 10, 2021).
[2] Vincent Larouche, “De Plus en Plus D’Entreprises se Dénoncent Elles-Mêmes“, La Presse+ (11 novembre 2021), (translated into English).

by Guy PinsonnaultJamieson D. Virgin, Chris Scheitterlein, and Anika Klassen (Articling Student)

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2021

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Environmental Protection: An Essential Consideration for Any Minor Exemption

The Quebec Court of Appeal quashed, on environmental grounds, a municipal resolution on a minor exemption

Read More
Feb 22, 2024
Featured Insight

2024 Update: Risks of Anonymized and Aggregated Data

The ability to glean personal information from both anonymized and aggregated data creates a risk of re-identification.

Read More
Feb 21, 2024
Featured Insight

Defending Dignity in the Dawn of Deepfakes

On January 29, 2024, in an era dominated by digital connectivity and rapid technological advancements, BC's Intimate Images Protection Act comes into force.

Read More
Feb 16, 2024
Featured Insight

Exploring Extraterritoriality: Do You Need a Physical Presence for Privacy Laws to Apply?

Join McMillan and Kochhar & Co. for an international webinar about the extraterritorial application of privacy laws in each of their jurisdictions. Can organizations without a facility or employees in Canada or India be subject to local privacy legislation? This is a must-watch program for organizations doing business in Canada and/or India.

Wednesday, March 6, 2024
Featured Insight

OSFI Unveils New Supervisory Framework (Effective April 2024)

OSFI announced the release of its new Supervisory Framework for FRFIs and private pension plans, touted to be the most significant change in 25 years.

Read More
Feb 14, 2024