Cooperating Firm Agrees to Penalty Equal to 5 Times the Amount of Foreign Bribe
Cooperating Firm Agrees to Penalty Equal to 5 Times the Amount of Foreign Bribe
Griffiths Energy International Inc., a Calgary-based oil exploration and development company, has pled guilty to the offence of bribing a foreign official contrary to Canada’s Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act. The company has agreed to pay $10.35 million in fines for bribing a Chadian public official with $2 million in exchange for securing three contracts in Chad.
According to publicly disclosed information, between August 2009 and February 2011 Griffiths Energy entered into three production sharing contracts with the government of the Republic of Chad, providing exclusive rights to explore and develop reserves and resources over a combined area of 26,103 km2 in southern Chad. The contracts covered two oil basins for potential development, oil discoveries, and numerous exploration prospects. The company’s prior management negotiated and executed these contracts with two entities owned and controlled by a foreign public official and his spouse.
Griffiths Energy changed its senior management in September 2011 following the accidental drowning of Brad Griffiths, the company’s chairman and co-founder. The current management discovered suspicious contracts in November 2011 and voluntarily disclosed to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada and the U.S. Department of Justice that it had commenced an internal investigation into the nature, circumstances and propriety of the contracts. The internal investigation was supervised by a special committee of independent members of the firm’s board of directors and conducted by external legal counsel and a forensic accounting firm. In May 2012, Griffiths Energy disclosed that it was voluntarily sharing the results of the internal investigation and cooperating with the authorities.
On January 22, 2012 in a Calgary court, Griffiths Energy pled guilty under section 3(1)(b) of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act:
Every person commits an offence who, in order to obtain or retain an advantage in the course of business, directly or indirectly gives, offers or agrees to give or offer a loan, reward, advantage or benefit of any kind to a foreign public official or to any person for the benefit of a foreign public official
(a) as consideration for an act or omission by the official in connection with the performance of the official’s duties or functions; or
(b) to induce the official to use his or her position to influence any acts or decisions of the foreign state or public international organization for which the official performs duties or functions.
The fine jointly recommended by the prosecutor and Griffith’s counsel has yet to be approved by the court.
heightened enforcement environment
After a slow start, enforcement of Canada’s anti-corruption legislation is becoming much more active.
This conviction follows the conviction of Niko Resources, another Calgary-based energy company, which was fined $9.5 million in June 2011 for bribing a minister responsible for energy in the government of Bangladesh. The RCMP has also indicated that it has dozens of other ongoing investigations in progress. At the same time, the Charbonneau Inquiry into corruption in the province of Québec has raised media and public concern about domestic corruption, creating an environment in which vigorous enforcement can be expected.
by Elisabeth S. Preston, A. Neil Campbell and Monica Podgorny, student-at-law
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2013
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Capital Gains Confusion: The Reporting Conundrum for Investment Funds
Considerations when determining whether to complete T3 returns on the basis of the proposed capital gains tax changes that have yet to be enacted.
Know What You Are Leasing: Case Comment on Augusta Studios Inc. v 8699011 Canada Inc., 2024 ONSC 1905
A case comment on carefully describing areas that are or are not intended to be leased, and when a landlord ought to know about a subtenancy.
Beyond Borders: BC Court issues seminal ruling on the jurisdictional application of the Personal Information Protection Act
In Clearview v. OIPC, the BC Supreme Court provided clear guidance on the application of BC PIPA to foreign companies: the real and substantial connection test.
Motor Vehicle Protection Products in Alberta: New Guidance on What Constitutes Insurance
Overview of Alberta insurance regulator bulletins released on December 23, 2024 on the treatment of vehicle protection products and what constitutes insurance.
Sale of Light-duty Combustion Vehicles Prohibited in Québec Starting in 2035
The Québec government adopted final regulations in December to prohibit the sale of passenger and other light-duty combustion vehicles in the province in 2035.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.