


How do the New Travel Restrictions in British Columbia Impact Employers who Require Employees to Travel for Work Purposes?
How do the New Travel Restrictions in British Columbia Impact Employers who Require Employees to Travel for Work Purposes?
We have received queries from clients wanting to know how the new travel restrictions in British Columbia might impact their employees who are required to travel within the Province for work purposes. The good news is that work related travel has been classified as essential (discussed below). That means the new restrictions should not have any impact on businesses that require their employees to travel for work outside of their immediate environment or between Health Authorities.
A new Ministerial Order was made public today that restricts non-essential travel between three Regions in the Province. These restrictions will remain in effect until May 25, 2021.
For purposes of restricting non-essential travel within the Province, the Ministerial Order combines the five Health Authorities into three Regions, as follows:
- The Fraser-Vancouver Coastal Health Authority Region (which combines the Fraser Health Authority and the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority).
- The Northern-Interior Health Authority Region (which combines the Northern Health Authority, the Interior Health Authority and the local health areas of Bella Coola Valley, Central Coast and Hope).
- The Vancouver Island Health Authority Region (which includes only the Vancouver Island Health Authority).
Residents are therefore restricted from undertaking non-essential travel between the three Regions, but can still travel without restriction within each Region.
The Ministerial Order lists the following as essential travel:
- Returning to your principal residence, moving or helping someone move.
- Work, both paid and unpaid (volunteer).
- Commercial transportation of goods.
- Getting health care or social services or helping someone get those services.
- Court appearance, complying with a court order or parole check-in.
- Exercising parental responsibilities.
- Child care services.
- Attending classes at a post-secondary institution or school.
- Responding to a critical incident, like search and rescue operations.
- Providing care to a person because of a psychological, behavioural or health condition, or a physical, cognitive or mental impairment.
- Visiting a resident (as an essential visitor) at long-term care or assisted living facility.
- Attending a funeral.
- Travelling under a PHO variance.
As mentioned above, work related travel as been classified as essential and therefore not impacted by the new restrictions.
Based on information that is publicly available at this stage, it does not appear that police will be conducting random spot checks for enforcement purposes. Instead, periodic road checks may be set up at certain key locations that are typically associated with holiday travel. Police can issue fines for non-compliance.
by Dianne Rideout and Michelle McKinnon
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2021
Insights (5 Posts)
Fanning the Flames of Liability: The Ontario Court of Appeal Considers Product Liability Issues in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Burr v. Tecumseh Products of Canada Limited, 2023 ONCA 135 provides a helpful overview of product liability law.
A Look at Some Key Findings by the Alberta Securities Commission in Re Bison Acquisition Corp.
On December 21, 2021, a panel of the Alberta Securities Commission issued its written decision providing its reasons for the oral ruling it made on July 12, 2021 regarding applications brought by Bison Acquisition Corp. and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation Exchange Limited Partnership, as well as Inter Pipeline Ltd. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation.
Employer’s Disturbing Termination Conduct Results in $15,000 Moral Damages Award
Teljeur v Aurora Hotel Group 2023 ONSC 1324 provides example of post-termination conduct and bad faith damages.
Succeeding at Succession: Tips on Corporate Governance including How to Navigate Board Renewals and Elections
Stakeholders are demanding good corporate governance, which includes effective succession planning where a range of skills, experience, and backgrounds are highly valued and reflected. In collaboration with WATSON, a national multidisciplinary governance firm, join us in the morning on Wednesday, April 19, to discuss strategies and action plans that drive robust succession planning and strong corporate governance.
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar”
Adjudication under the Construction Act: Court Confirms Test to Apply for Judicial Review a “High Bar” Anatolia Tile & Stone Inc. v Flow-Rite Inc. 2023 ONSC 129.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.