How do the New Travel Restrictions in British Columbia Impact Employers who Require Employees to Travel for Work Purposes?
How do the New Travel Restrictions in British Columbia Impact Employers who Require Employees to Travel for Work Purposes?
We have received queries from clients wanting to know how the new travel restrictions in British Columbia might impact their employees who are required to travel within the Province for work purposes. The good news is that work related travel has been classified as essential (discussed below). That means the new restrictions should not have any impact on businesses that require their employees to travel for work outside of their immediate environment or between Health Authorities.
A new Ministerial Order was made public today that restricts non-essential travel between three Regions in the Province. These restrictions will remain in effect until May 25, 2021.
For purposes of restricting non-essential travel within the Province, the Ministerial Order combines the five Health Authorities into three Regions, as follows:
- The Fraser-Vancouver Coastal Health Authority Region (which combines the Fraser Health Authority and the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority).
- The Northern-Interior Health Authority Region (which combines the Northern Health Authority, the Interior Health Authority and the local health areas of Bella Coola Valley, Central Coast and Hope).
- The Vancouver Island Health Authority Region (which includes only the Vancouver Island Health Authority).
Residents are therefore restricted from undertaking non-essential travel between the three Regions, but can still travel without restriction within each Region.
The Ministerial Order lists the following as essential travel:
- Returning to your principal residence, moving or helping someone move.
- Work, both paid and unpaid (volunteer).
- Commercial transportation of goods.
- Getting health care or social services or helping someone get those services.
- Court appearance, complying with a court order or parole check-in.
- Exercising parental responsibilities.
- Child care services.
- Attending classes at a post-secondary institution or school.
- Responding to a critical incident, like search and rescue operations.
- Providing care to a person because of a psychological, behavioural or health condition, or a physical, cognitive or mental impairment.
- Visiting a resident (as an essential visitor) at long-term care or assisted living facility.
- Attending a funeral.
- Travelling under a PHO variance.
As mentioned above, work related travel as been classified as essential and therefore not impacted by the new restrictions.
Based on information that is publicly available at this stage, it does not appear that police will be conducting random spot checks for enforcement purposes. Instead, periodic road checks may be set up at certain key locations that are typically associated with holiday travel. Police can issue fines for non-compliance.
by Dianne Rideout and Michelle McKinnon
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2021
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Ten Years Later: The Justifiable Expectations Standard and the Evolution of Public Interest Powers in Canada
In this paper, the authors revisit the standards applied under the OSC's public interest jurisdiction, their shortcomings, and the need for a new framework.
British Columbia’s New Money Judgment Enforcement Act: An Overview
An overview of the new British Columbia Money Judgment Enforcement Act.
Navigating the Grey (Part 2): Deciphering the Meaning of the term “Making” under Section 42 of the Canadian Patent Act.
The Federal Court of Canada provides further clarity on the meaning of the term "making" under Section 42 of the Patent Act.
McMillan’s Annual Privacy, Data Protection and Cybersecurity Client Seminar
This program will provide an overview of recent significant decisions and regulatory guidance, along with discussions about the privacy implications of AI and how deceptive design patterns could be impacting your organization’s legal compliance.
Risking More than Just a Bad Review: Employer Found Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employee in Providing Services
Are employers focused on claims of harassment or discrimination by employees against members of the public who are receiving services from the employer?
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.