Government Proposes Fundamental Changes to the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy
Government Proposes Fundamental Changes to the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy
On May 15, 2020, the federal Department of Finance (“Finance”) announced the extension of the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (the “CEWS”) program by an additional 12 weeks to cover periods through August 29, 2020. At the time of the announcement, Finance also initiated a consultation process with key business and labour representatives (the “Consultations”) to canvass potential adjustments to the CEWS program, including the possibility of changing the 30 percent revenue decline threshold for eligibility to claim the CEWS (the “30% Threshold”).
On June 10, 2020, the government further announced that the same eligibility criteria that had applied to the CEWS program to date would apply in respect of the fourth period of the program (i.e., the period from June 7, 2020 to July 4, 2020). (You can access our past bulletins on the CEWS program here under “Tax”.)
On July 13, 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau indicated that the duration of the CEWS program would be extended to December 2020. The details of this second extension, as well as the adjustments to the program to be made as a consequence of the Consultations, were formally announced by Finance on July 17, 2020 (the “Proposed Changes”).
The Proposed Changes
The Proposed Changes fundamentally alter the scope of the CEWS program and the eligibility criteria to claim the CEWS.
At a high level, the Proposed Changes apply on a going-forward basis (i.e., commencing with the fifth Qualifying Period (as defined below) that started on July 5, 2020) and are intended to broaden the reach of the CEWS program and provide more extensive support to targeted sectors that have been most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
On July 20, 2020, the Proposed Changes were introduced in Parliament in Bill C-20, An Act respecting further COVID-19 measures. It is anticipated that the Canada Revenue Agency will administer the CEWS program in a manner consistent with the Proposed Changes starting immediately.
Revised Parameters of the CEWS
During the Consultations, Finance received feedback that the 30% Threshold was an arbitrary point of demarcation that may promote inefficiencies. Certain stakeholders expressed concern that the 30% Threshold is too stringent and does not address the significantly negative impact that businesses with less than a 30% decline in revenue have experienced. Conversely, some stakeholders asserted that the existing CEWS regime did not adequately address the circumstances of business sectors that have been hit particularly hard by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Based on the feedback received by Finance, the Proposed Changes will generally replace the 30% Threshold for CEWS eligibility with more nuanced, incremental eligibility criteria.
Employers will recall that the CEWS program is administered on a period-by-period basis, with each period spanning 4 weeks (each, a “Qualifying Period”). The Proposed Changes generally apply in respect of the following Qualifying Periods: Period 5 (July 5 to August 1, 2020), Period 6 (August 2 to August 29, 2020), Period 7 (August 30 to September 26, 2020), Period 8 (September 27 to October 24, 2020), and Period 9 (October 25 to November 21, 2020). While Finance has announced that the CEWS program will be extended through a tenth Qualifying Period (November 22, 2020 through December 19, 2020), the government has not released details on how the CEWS program will be administered in respect of the tenth Qualifying Period.
Eligible Employers and Employees
The CEWS may only be claimed in respect of “eligible employees“, generally defined as individuals employed in Canada in a Qualifying Period. The Proposed Changes do not generally alter this definition. However, for Qualifying Periods after Qualifying Period 4, the government proposes to remove the requirement that employees not be without remuneration for 14 or more consecutive days in a Qualifying Period in order to be “eligible employees”.
The Proposed Changes expand the list of eligible employers (referred to as “eligible entities” under the CEWS program). “Eligible entities” are defined to include (i) corporations or trusts (other than tax-exempt corporations or trusts), (ii) individuals (other than trusts), (iii) registered charities (other than “public institutions”), (iv) certain non-profit and tax-exempt organizations (other than certain “public institutions”) and (v) partnerships, all of the members of which would qualify as “eligible entities”.
The Backgrounder to the Proposed Changes clarifies that eligible entities also include:
- Partnerships that are up to 50 percent owned by non-eligible members;
- Indigenous government-owned corporations that are carrying on a business, as well as partnerships where the partners are Indigenous governments and eligible employers;
- Registered Canadian Amateur Athletic Associations;
- Registered Journalism Organizations; and
- Non-public colleges and schools, including institutions that offer specialized services, such as arts schools, driving schools, language schools or flight schools.
The Proposed Changes do not alter the definition of what constitutes “eligible remuneration”. “Eligible remuneration” includes most salary, wages and other remuneration payable to an employee, including most fees, commissions or other amounts payable in respect of services. Certain notable exclusions from the definition of “eligible remuneration” include “retiring allowances” (e.g., certain non-statutory severance payments), most equity-based compensation, including most amounts in respect of stock options, and benefits from the personal use of an employer-owned vehicle.
For purposes of computing the amount of the CEWS for Qualifying Periods subsequent to Qualifying Period 4, the Proposed Changes provide that the measure of the amount of remuneration paid to active, arm’s length employees will be based solely on the actual remuneration paid to such employees. Under the original CEWS rules, the amount of the remuneration of an employee used to compute entitlement to the CEWS was generally permitted to potentially be based on the employee’s pre-crisis weekly remuneration.
Proposed Changes to the Computation of the CEWS
Broadly speaking, the Proposed Changes will adjust the computation of the amount of the CEWS in two principal ways: (1) the applicable rate structure will differ in its application to active and furloughed employees, and (2) the CEWS will consist of a “Base Subsidy” and a “Top-Up Subsidy”.
Under the Proposed Changes, the total amount of the CEWS in respect of an eligible employee for a week in a Qualifying Period will generally be equal to the “CEWS Rate” multiplied by the eligible remuneration, up to a maximum of $1,129 per week, paid to the eligible employee in respect of the week in the Qualifying Period. The “CEWS Rate” is equal to the sum of the “base percentage” and the “top-up percentage” in respect of the eligible entity, as discussed in greater detail below.
Under the revised CEWS program, the Base Subsidy will generally be available to all qualifying entities that incur a qualifying drop in revenue. The amount of the Base Subsidy in respect of a Qualifying Period will be a function of the qualifying entity’s “base percentage” for the Qualifying Period.
The maximum “base percentage” that may be claimed in respect of a Qualifying Period will decline over time. The maximum “base percentage” that may be claimed in respect of (i) Qualifying Periods 5 and 6 is 60%, (ii) Qualifying Period 7 is 50%, (iii) Qualifying Period 8 is 40%, and (iv) Qualifying Period 9 is 20%.
The “base percentage” of a qualifying entity for a Qualifying Period will be dependent on the qualifying entity’s “revenue reduction percentage” for the Qualifying Period. The “revenue reduction percentage” of a qualifying entity will generally reflect the reduction in the qualifying entity’s qualifying revenue for the “current reference period” relative to the qualifying revenue of the qualifying entity for the applicable “prior reference period” as illustrated in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Relevant time periods for the Base Subsidy
|Qualifying Period||Prior Reference Period under General Approach||Prior Reference Period under Alternative Approach|
|Qualifying Period 5||July 2020 over July 2019 or June 2020 over June 2019||July 2020 or June 2020 over average of January and February 2020|
|Qualifying Period 6||August 2020 over August 2019 or July 2020 over July 2019||August 2020 or July 2020 over average of January and February 2020|
|Qualifying Period 7||September 2020 over September 2019 or August 2020 over August 2019||September 2020 or August 2020 over average of January and February 2020|
|Qualifying Period 8||October 2020 over October 2019 or September 2020 over September 2019||October 2020 or September 2020 over average of January and February 2020|
|Qualifying Period 9||November 2020 over November 2019 or October 2020 over October 2019||November 2020 or October 2020 over average of January and February 2020|
Insights (5 Posts)
The Present and Future of A.I. Regulation
Join us for a session with industry experts who will share valuable insights into the latest trends and developments in artificial intelligence with a particular focus on regulation.
Secured Lending in Canada: A Guide for U.S. Lenders
A guide to secured lending in Canada; summarizes regulatory matters, tax, security, insolvency and restructuring issues in Canada.
Don’t Wing It – Implications for Project Proponents under Canada’s Species at Risk Act
This bulletin discusses the application of the Species at Risk Act, a federal environmental statute whose potential impact on private parties is overlooked.
Bill 112: The Hazel McCallion Act, 2023 and Potential Impacts of the Proposed Dissolution of the Peel Region
On May 18, 2023, Ontario passed Bill 112 proposing the dissolution of Peel Region, and similar legislation could impact other regions in the near future.
Capital Markets Podcast: Everything You Need to Know About Going Private Transactions
What advantages do private companies have over public companies and why would a public company decide to go private? This podcast episode dives into the implications of going private transactions in Canada.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.