Revocation of the “Northwestern Exemption”
Revocation of the “Northwestern Exemption”
On August 15, 2018, the Canadian Securities Administrators announced in Multilateral CSA Notice 32-302 Notice of Revocation for Certain Local Orders Providing Registration Exemption for Trades in Connections with Certain Prospectus-Exempt Distributions and Update on BC Instrument 32-517 Exemption from Dealer Registration Requirement for Trades in Securities of Mortgage Investment Entities (the “CSA Notice”) that securities regulatory authorities of British Columbia, Manitoba, Nunavut, the Northwest Territories and Yukon will be revoking their registration exemptions that form the “Northwestern Exemption”. In addition, the British Columbia Securities Commission (the “BCSC”) has announced its intention to allow BC Instrument 32-517 – Exemption from Dealer Registration Requirement for Trades in Securities of Mortgage Investment Entities (“BCI 32-517”) to expire on February 15, 2019.
The Northwestern Exemption permits finders to place prospectus-exempt (private placement) securities without the requirement to be registered in any jurisdiction. For a summary of the current registration regime see our bulletin “Finders be Aware – BCSC Proposes to Revoke Trade-Based Exemption”.
The local orders that form the Northwestern Exemption were adopted by British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, the Northwestern Territories and Yukon (collectively, the “Participating Jurisdictions”). The Participating Jurisdictions except Alberta and Saskatchewan have agreed to revoke their local orders comprising the Northwestern Exemption effective April 30, 2019. Alberta and Saskatchewan are considering whether to revoke their local orders and will advise of their approach in due course.
The revocation of the Northwestern Exemption will enhance investor protection and lead to greater harmonization between the securities laws of the Participating Jurisdictions other than Alberta and Saskatchewan and the rest of Canada.
British Columbia is the only province that has a registration exemption specifically available for Mortgage Investment Entities and by allowing BCI 32-517 to expire on February 15, 2019, the BCSC will achieve greater harmony between the securities laws of British Columbia and the rest of Canada.
Moving Forward in British Columbia
When BC Instrument 32-513 – Registration Exemption for Trades in Connection with Certain Prospectus-Exempt Distributions (“BCI 32-513”) and BCI 32-517 expire, any finder who is considered to be in the business of trading securities who places a resident in British Columbia in a private placement will be required to register as a dealer or exempt market dealer, as the case may be. The BCSC is implementing certain transition provisions to allow market participants to complete an orderly wind-up or seek registration. Those relying on BCI 32-513 or BCI 32-517 before they expire may continue operating in reliance on the exemption if:
- the BCSC has received a substantially complete 33-109F6 – Firm Registration by April 30, 2019 and paid the related fees; and
- the filer is in compliance with the terms of that relief on the expiry date and on an ongoing basis.
For more information on the CSA Notice, or a list of local orders being revoked, the CSA Notice can be accessed here.
by Marina Tran
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2018
Related Publications (5 Posts)
Even in the summer months, the legal news does not let up. Here are some recent decisions and legislative developments as we head into the 2021 fall season.
Join McMillan's annual Employment and Labour Seminar on Tuesday, October 5th as we address significant legal developments and provide practical advice on responding to employee issues.
Canada v. Canada North Group Inc. provided much needed clarity regarding the order of priority for unremitted source deductions in restructuring proceedings.
The COVID-19 pandemic and increased concerns over environmental and social issues, such as climate change and systemic racism, have prompted conversations throughout global capital markets.
Divisional Court confirms Environmental Significance of Ministerial Zoning Orders and Importance of Consultation under the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993
Review of Divisional Court decision: Ontario’s compliance with Environmental Bill of Rights in passing Bill 197, particularly re: Ministerial Zoning Orders
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.