Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

The Govt of Canada Extends the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act

August 2016 Transportation Bulletin < 1 read

Following approval by both the House of Commons and the Senate, the Government of Canada announced on June 15, 2016 that it had postponed for one year the repeal of certain provisions of the Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act.  As reported in our previous bulletin, the Government of Canada had previously announced its intention to do so.  The now formalized extension of the Fair Rail For Grain Farmers Act will continue to amend the Canada Transportation Act (the “CTA”) until August 1, 2017 to:

  • allow Cabinet to require Canadian National Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Company to move minimum quantities of certain grain commodities within specified time periods, subject to administrative monetary penalties for failure; and
  • empower the Canadian Transportation Agency to
    • require a federal railway company to compensate any person for expenses suffered as a result of that railway company’s failure to fulfill its service obligations to that person;
    • extend the regulated interswitching limits beyond 30 kilometres for certain regions or goods (so far, the Agency has extended the regulated interswitching limits from 30 kilometres to 160 kilometres for all goods in the three prairie provinces); and
    • make regulations specifying what constitutes “operational terms” for the purposes of service level arbitrations under the CTA.

The announcement indicates that the postponement is intended to allow participants in the freight rail supply chain to plan under predictable conditions while the Government of Canada considers recommendations made in the report (discussed here) in respect of the 2015 statutory review of the CTA.

by Ryan Gallagher and François Tougas

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2016

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

More Than Meets the Eye: The Legal Implications of British Columbia’s Agreement to Recognize Aboriginal Title Over Haida Gwaii

An analysis of legal implications related to the BC Government's agreement with the Haida Nation to recognize Aboriginal title over Haida Gwaii.

Read More
Apr 23, 2024
Featured Insight

Lessons Learned from the TTC’s Ransomware Attack

Lessons learned from the recent investigation by the Ontario IPC into the effectiveness of the TTC's cybersecurity measures and ransomware attack response

Read More
Apr 23, 2024
Featured Insight

Don’t Get Caught by Canada’s Patent Novelty Grace-Period

The key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.

Read More
Apr 23, 2024
Featured Insight

Shifting Gears – Canada to Consider New Motor Vehicle Equipment Regulations to Help Prevent Auto Theft

Transport Canada announces plan to update safety standards to combat auto theft.

Read More
Apr 22, 2024