R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar
R. vs Greater Sudbury Webinar
Watch the webinar recording in our archived library: http://mcmillan.lawcast.tv/
Join Patrick Groom, Victor Kim, and Annik Forristal of McMillan’s National Construction Group on Wednesday, December 13th for a discussion about the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in R. v. Greater Sudbury.
Following a brief overview of the case and the SCC’s split decision, this discussion will focus on the implications of the decision to the roles and responsibilities of each project party, including the owner, contractor and design consultant (architect and engineer). The discussion will be interactive and will include an extensive Q&A period.
Topics include:
- What did the Supreme Court of Canada decide? On what points was the Court split?
- What are the responsibilities of the owner, contractor and consultant for health and safety at a construction site?
- What can you do as an owner, contractor and/or consultant to protect yourself from liability?
- What terms and conditions should be included in contracts with owners, contractors and consultants?
CPD: For legal practitioners, this program qualifies for up to 90 minutes of Substantive CPD (ON), 90 minutes of CPD (BC), and 90 minutes of CLE (QC).
Date and Time
Wednesday, December 13, 2023
12:00 pm – 1:30 pm ET
Speakers
Annik Forristal
Partner, Construction & Infrastructure
Patrick Groom
Partner, Employment & Labour Relations
Victor Kim
Associate, Employment & Labour Relations
Insights (5 Posts)View More
Capital Gains Confusion: The Reporting Conundrum for Investment Funds
Considerations when determining whether to complete T3 returns on the basis of the proposed capital gains tax changes that have yet to be enacted.
Know What You Are Leasing: Case Comment on Augusta Studios Inc. v 8699011 Canada Inc., 2024 ONSC 1905
A case comment on carefully describing areas that are or are not intended to be leased, and when a landlord ought to know about a subtenancy.
Beyond Borders: BC Court issues seminal ruling on the jurisdictional application of the Personal Information Protection Act
In Clearview v. OIPC, the BC Supreme Court provided clear guidance on the application of BC PIPA to foreign companies: the real and substantial connection test.
Motor Vehicle Protection Products in Alberta: New Guidance on What Constitutes Insurance
Overview of Alberta insurance regulator bulletins released on December 23, 2024 on the treatment of vehicle protection products and what constitutes insurance.
Sale of Light-duty Combustion Vehicles Prohibited in Québec Starting in 2035
The Québec government adopted final regulations in December to prohibit the sale of passenger and other light-duty combustion vehicles in the province in 2035.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.