


Foreign Corruption: Canada Makes “Facilitation Payments” Illegal
Foreign Corruption: Canada Makes “Facilitation Payments” Illegal
The Canadian government has repealed the exemption for “facilitation payments” that has been contained in the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act since it was enacted in 1998. Amendments which strengthened the CFPOA in 2013 included the changes needed to bring facilitation payments under the bribery offence, but they were not proclaimed in force until October 31, 2017.
What are facilitation payments?
Facilitation payments (often referred to as “grease payments”) are generally regarded as payments made to expedite or secure the performance by a government official of the duties or functions of an act of a routine nature that is part of his or her duties. Typical examples include the issuance of licences or permits, the processing of official documents (e.g. visas or work permits), the provision of services that are normally offered to the public (e.g. telecommunications, rail, power and other utilities), and the provision of services that are provided as required (e.g. police protection, inspections of goods, etc.). However, the CFPOA exemption never extended to payments related to decisions by officials to award or continue business with a party or the terms of such business relationships.
Compliance Requirements
The OECD has encouraged member states to prohibit facilitation payments, but few have done so. Canada’s change of position places it among the strictest anti-corruption regimes in the world, following the leadership of the UK in its 2010 Bribery Act. While the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and many other regimes continue to permit facilitation payments, Canadian corporations and individuals doing business anywhere in the world now need to comply with the stricter CFPOA standard. (The 2013 amendments extended the application of the CFPOA to include jurisdiction based on nationality, in addition to its application to offences committed in, or which have a real and substantial connection to, Canada.
The expansion of the CFPOA to cover facilitation payments is consistent with the Canadian government’s commitment to more vigorous anti-corruption enforcement over the past 5 years. It should provide a catalyst for firms to update anti-corruption compliance programs. For companies that have already moved to prohibit facilitation payments as a matter of policy, this change creates a useful opportunity to refresh training and annual certification measures.
by Dr. A. Neil Campbell
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2017
Insights (5 Posts)View More
All Things Tariffs: A Comprehensive Overview of Where We Stand Today
In response to US tariffs, Canada has imposed retaliatory tariffs on a wide variety of products. Recent developments now include opportunities for remission.
Who Owns a Thought? Navigating Legal Issues in Neurotech
In this bulletin, we explore some legal considerations that could arise as consumer-oriented neurotechnology becomes increasingly accessible.
Return-to-Office Mandate Triggers Constructive Dismissal (… This Time)
An employer’s return-to-office mandate constituted grounds for constructive dismissal of an employee with a longstanding work-from-home arrangement.
Breaking the Deadlock: How Shareholders’ Agreements and “Shotgun” Clauses Help Resolve Disputes
Shareholder disputes are common in businesses, but a well-drafted shareholders’ agreement containing a “shotgun” clause can help provide a resolution.
The End of a Saga: Application of Due Diligence Assessment Criteria for “Employers” in R v. Sudbury Upheld
The Ontario Court of Appeal issued a final ruling that provides practical guidance to project owners respecting their obligations as “employers” under the OHSA.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.