Insights Header image
Insights Header image
Insights Header image

New Requirements for CBCA Corporations: June 2019 Amendments

July 2019 Corporate Governance Bulletin 3 minute read

The federal government has passed Bill C-97, which amends the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”).  The Bill received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019.  The amendments are aimed at providing greater transparency over company ownership and assisting authorities in prosecuting financial crimes.  The amendments will: 1) clarify the fiduciary duties of directors and officers; 2) allow enforcement agencies to access a corporation’s Register of Individuals with Significant Control (“ISC Register”); and 3) impose additional disclosure requirements.

1) Duty to Act in the Best Interests of the Corporation

The CBCA mandates that directors and officers, in exercising their powers, shall “act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation.”  In BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders (“BCE”), the Supreme Court of Canada clarified that the “best interests of the corporation” does not mean the best interests of the corporation’s shareholders. Rather the interests of other stakeholders may be relevant.  Following the principles in BCE, the legislature has amended the CBCA to enumerate different stakeholder interests.  The directors and officers may consider the following factors when acting with a view to the best interests of the corporation:

(a) the interests of

(i) shareholders,

(ii) employees,

(iii) retirees and pensioners,

(iv) creditors,

(v) consumers, and

(vi) governments;

(b) the environment; and

(c) the long-term interests of the corporation.

2) Giving Access to Enforcement Agencies

Private CBCA corporations are required to maintain a register of individuals with significant control over the corporation.  The ISC Register requirement was introduced in earlier amendments to the CBCA in December 2018, and is in effect as of June 13, 2019.  The recent CBCA amendments require a corporation to provide investigative bodies with a copy of the ISC Register or specified information in the ISC Register, on request.  Any police force, the Canada Revenue Agency or equivalent provincial agencies, or any prescribed body are considered investigative bodies entitled to access an ISC Register.  Access is limited to circumstances where the agency has reasonable grounds to suspect that the information would be relevant to investigating an enumerated offence and that the corporation subject to the request committed the offence, facilitated the offence or protected a person who committed the offence.

A company is guilty of an offence if it fails to comply with the new requirements to provide and/or disclose the register information to an investigative body and may be liable for a fine of up to $5,000.

3) Additional Disclosure Obligations – Say-on-Pay, Compensation Clawbacks and Diversity

The CBCA amendments will impose additional disclosure obligations, but they are not yet in force.

Under the CBCA, directors have the power to fix their own remuneration and that of officers and employees. The CBCA amendments will create a new obligation on companies to develop an approach to the remuneration of directors and senior management, which they must send to shareholders. The company must also hold a non-binding say-on-pay vote at every annual meeting.

Furthermore, CBCA companies must disclose information about clawbacks of incentive benefits paid to members of senior management and information about the well-being of employees, retirees, and pensioners.

The amendments will also require CBCA corporations to disclose prescribed information about diversity of directors and senior management.  While the regulations have not yet been enacted, past draft CBCA diversity regulations suggest that disclosure will include the representation of women, aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities, and members of visible minorities on the board and in management.  These changes mark an era of greater transparency and better corporate responsibility standards in Canadian corporate law.

It is important to note, however, that these amendments only apply to federally incorporated companies. Those incorporated under provincial statutes remain unaffected.

by Samantha Gordon and Sajal Waheed, Summer Law Student

A Cautionary Note

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2019

Insights (5 Posts)View More

Featured Insight

Another Thumbs Up? Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada Filed in Relation to Emoji Contract Interpretation Decision

We discuss a recent application for leave to appeal the decision in Achter Land & Cattle Ltd. v South West Terminal Ltd. to the Supreme Court of Canada

Read More
Feb 19, 2025
Featured Insight

Navigating Economic Uncertainty: What Companies Need to Know About Force Majeure Clauses Under Quebec Law

This bulletin explores what constitutes a force majeure clause and how it is applied in B2B commercial agreements.

Read More
Feb 18, 2025
Featured Insight

Double the Trouble: The BCCA Refuses to Strike Duplicative Class Actions Before Certification

Class action bulletin. Summary of InvestorCOM Inc. v. L'Anton, 2025 BCCA 40, a recent decision of the BCCA on the issue of duplicative class actions.

Read More
Feb 12, 2025
Featured Insight

Recent Developments in the Canadian Psychedelics Industry

This bulletin provides an update on recent developments in Canada's psychedelics industry.

Read More
Feb 12, 2025
Featured Insight

Company Ordered to Cease Using Facial Recognition Technology to Monitor Access to its Facilities: Overview of Quebec Privacy Regulator’s Decision

In this bulletin, we provide an overview of the Quebec privacy regulator's decision in ordering the Company to cease using its facial recognition technology.

Read More
Feb 11, 2025